Skip to main content

Memories of the Son of Memory (Part VI): Shakespeare in the Cedars

I was originally leery of going to the Utah Shakespearean Festival (now without the adjectival -an ending for reasons I don't fully understand). Part of me felt obligated in the same way I'd felt obligated to learn about and like Shakespeare in the first place. Part of me was curious, but the idea of a festival--a stereotypical Renaissance Faire--ran through my head and persuaded me not to bother.
Still, it was summer time in 2006 and I'd had enough positive experience with Shakespeare that I wanted to try out the USF.
We went ahead and bought the cheapest hotel we could find and snagged some tickets for Antony and Cleopatra and Hamlet. Money and interest prevented us from picking up the hat trick of Shakespeare plays that the USF does (almost) every summer, leaving The Merry Wives of Windsor unseen, but I was excited to see what it was like to watch professionally made productions in southern Utah.
The day or two before we left, I was walking past the discount book section at Wal-Mart--you know, the place that every author aspires to--and a small black book with red lettering caught my eye. Hamlet: Poem Unlimited. Curious, I picked it up. A short book, it looked like it was an essay on the play. Now, I'd watched the Mel Gibson version not too long before, having eschewed my juvenile rejection of the movie by then, and I was most looking forward, of the two plays, to Hamlet. So I added it to whatever else I was buying and checked out.
While driving the two and a half hours from our home in Pleasant Grove to Cedar City--a nervous drive for me, since I'd never done it before--I spent some of the time reading through Harold Bloom's writings. It was my first real experience with direct Shakespeare criticism and it really shocked me. Not only does Bloom write with an air of authority that would make most pastors envy, but the ideas were so complex that I could hardly believe that there was so much inside the play. How had I not seen such profundity before?
With some of Bloom's ideas rattling about my head, we took the first Cedar City exit. This was before either Gayle or I had a smartphone with GPS capabilities, so we had a printed out map from MapQuest and the address of the Festival and our motel. Pulling off I-15, we arced around the off-ramp and began working south down State Street. Eventually we got to the ghetto hotel where we checked into our room. We had a little bit of time to kill, but not a lot, before that night's Antony.
Finding the Festival was fairly simple, as Cedar City is built on the pioneer grid system of logic and wide roads, so we finally made it to Southern Utah University. I don't know my exact feelings when we came upon the Adams Theater, a replica of the Globe Theatre, complete with faux-Tudor facades on the round and hunter-orange colored stadium seats on the inside. Tarts, candied nuts, water, coffee, and sodas were being sold from a small refreshment shack on the east side while undergrads dressed in Renaissance-era liveries hocked commemorative programs and homemade suckers. Being in southern Utah in the summer meant that the sun wouldn't set until nearly nine o'clock, so the play didn't start until eight.
We had gone for price over experience that night, with seats fairly close to the back of the theater and on the second floor. While as a child I would've loved the balcony seats, as an adult I wasn't too keen on it. I had just received some new glasses, which did help a little, but we were simply too far away from the stage to know or care about what was going on. The man who played Antony wasn't particularly captivating, and Cleopatra, while she had poise, didn't really ensnare me. Years later, I was speaking to a veteran of the Festival about that night and he said that he could hardly wait for the asps to come out. It was, by many counts, a pretty poor performance.
Somewhat bored and definitely disheartened, we returned to our hotel room. Gayle--always more aware of things than I--was quite unimpressed, though she hid any misgivings about the vacation from me. We were away from work and larger responsibilities. Why worry too much?
Due to the proximity of Cedar City to Brian's Head National Park, we spent the next day driving through beautiful red rock country in our blue Ford Focus. We bumped into my uncle, aunt, and children who lived in Saint George (about an hour south of Cedar) and explained why we were there. I can easily recall my aunt expressing her one-part-disgust-two-parts-respect for the actors who take faces full of spit as their coworkers spray their lines across the stage. Having been so far away from the action the previous night, we couldn't really speak to that, but smiled and made appropriate grossed out noises.
We wandered on a short hike. Since neither Gayle nor I is inclined toward physical activities in general, we considered it more of a nature walk. We wandered to a peaceful pond, stared at the immense trees, and avoided potential bee populations. All in all, it was a delightful day.
Evening came and with it we may have managed to hit the Green Show, a free warm up performance of singing, dancing, and (purposefully) horrible jokes. Now that I consider it more closely, I'm almost positive that we did, since I can recall some Cleopatra jokes and some "Kiss my asp" phrases groaning the crowd. Due to my greater interest in Hamlet, we ponied up the extra cash and purchased tickets on one of the wings and more in the center of the crowd.
This was a choice that likely altered the trajectory of my life.
Brian Vaughn took the titular role and captivated my mind. Every time he exited, I was sad he was gone. Every nuance he placed, every word he dropped propelled the play forward and, with the frantic energy of Shakespeare as fuel, drove us toward the catastrophe with an air of agency that is oftentimes lost.
One scene I remember particularly: After the almost-impossible-to-handle "To be or not to be..." speech, Ophelia comes in--the unexpected light of innocence that contrasts so starkly with Hamlet's darkness--and he exhales a tsunami of rage upon her that they both know she does not deserve. As he unfolds his furor at his mother-father and his ill-advised advisor, his emotions override his intelligence. With a final slur on her honor, Hamlet shrieks, "To a nunnery go!" and exits.
Vaughn's Hamlet was already partway through the door as he shouted this line, yet he did it with such power and volume that my clothing vibrated with the force of it.
I didn't blame Ophelia for sinking into tears after such a moment.
I can hardly recall how well the other parts were played. I can dimly recall thinking Polonius a pompous ass--that's how I've considered him for so long, however, that my instinct could just be confirmation bias in my memories--and the queen was passable. I do recall, though, that the man who had bungled Antony now played Claudius. As Gayle said, "It's okay that I don't like him now; he's the bad guy."
True.
Indeed, the poor work of the previous night only lent additional dislike of the incestuous Claudius, which amplified during the second part of Act IV where the prince is off to England and the other actors seem to be trying to keep the play moving long enough for it to make sense to see Hamlet return.
When Brian Vaughn took his bow for the standing ovation, he did so graciously. Then, just before exiting, he paused, turned around, and took another leg, impishly implying that he knew what we had enjoyed and was more than happy to have provided it. I don't begrudge him that correct reading of the audience.
Gayle and I went home elated and exhausted. A transformation had occurred in my mind, and after Gayle fell asleep, I stayed up late with Harold Bloom and chewed over parts of the play I'd just seen. Something substantial and transcendental had transpired during the course of that play. The humble stage in a small pioneer town in southern Utah had birthed something deep and life changing.
I've had a lot of time since then to ponder on what it was about Hamlet and Shakespeare and Hamlet that so profoundly influenced me. I'm confident that there are many reasons that have affected my feelings toward the Bard and this particular creation of his, but there must be credit given to when this play landed most heavily in my life.
At the time, I was studying for a career in English education while helping with the finances by working part time at a computer store. During my rare time off, I would work on a book that I'd had in mind since my first term in college. The summer before marrying Gayle, I had begun my first actual draft of the novel The Terra Campaign: Impetus. It would end up taking a couple of years for me to work through, and I had it in the back of my mind that I would teach for a little while, then provide for my family via my writings. Impetus would be my first foray into professional writing.
Delusion, however, can only satisfy one for so long and I eventually became consigned to reality instead. My writing, though excellent in my mind, was failing to gain traction with any of my alpha readers--and, reflecting back, I think the book had manifold problems with it--and I wasn't feeling nearly as capable at it as I thought that I should.
Simultaneously, I was despising every second of my job. It was tedious, it was soul-draining; it was insulting, it was wrong. Every aspect of my time in the store was against my beliefs (I felt sleazy for convincing people to buy crappy computers and overpriced add-ons) and the management was, I felt, hardly behaving the way that people ought to.
More deeply than that, however, was the idea that my unique self was being oppressed and obliterated by commercialism and market forces. I felt utterly unappreciated by those who claimed to care about me and mine. So when Hamlet shouts these lines at Guildenstern, I reverberated with his frustration and passion:
What young man doesn't read such passion and believe himself likewise victimized by "sponges" who have no authority, no understanding of capacity? Hamlet spoke to me because I could see myself in him--not in his bloodlust or philosophy, but in his frustration at being constantly underestimated. Earlier in the play, he says to his mother, "But I have that within which passeth show;/These but the trappings and the suits of woe." Indeed, that's what's so remarkable about Hamlet: we see a man confess to having something within him that surpasses an act and defies the trappings about him.
Other passages resonated with me: I have struggled with depression most of my life, having lightly considered suicide from time to rare time since, as best as I can recall, age ten or eleven. How striking it was, then, to read of Hamlet's own struggles with "self-slaughter" and finding a voice--a more eloquent voice--expressing my own senses and frustrations. This passage, in particular, taken from Act II scene ii, which has been held up as a brilliant piece of poetic plagiarism (as much of the sentiment is taken from Montaigne) and the most exact description of depression that I've ever seen:

Dark though he may be, Hamlet is an inspiration, and my 24-year-old self fell in love with that untamed power. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teaching in Utah

The Utah State Board of Education, in tandem with the state legislature, have a new answer to the shortage of Utah teachers: a bachelor's degree and a test are sufficient qualifications for being a teacher. I have some thoughts about this recent decision, but it requires some context. Additionally, this is a very  long read, so I don't blame you if you don't finish it. Well....maybe a little. But not enough to hurt our friendship. Probably. ARLs and Endorsements Teaching is a tricky career, and not all teachers start out wanting to be in the classroom. Fortunately, there are alternatives for people to become licensed teachers who come from this camp. We have a handful of possibilities, but the two I want to focus on are ARLs (Alternative Routes to Licensure) and endorsements. Both already require the bachelor's degree as the minimum requirement, and since that doesn't change in the new law, we'll set that aside as a commonality. As additional context, h...

Dark Necessities

The second of my "music video essays", I'm exploring the single from Red Hot Chili Peppers' newest album, The Getaway , "Dark Necessities". As I did before, I'm posting the video and the lyrics here on the essay, and encourage you to watch and read along. In the case of the Peppers, it's always a good idea to have the lyrics handy, as the lead singer, Anthony Kiedis, has a tendency of mumbling and/or pronouncing words uniquely to create a particular effect--or he's super high, either possibility is there.  The Set Up Here's the video: And here are the lyrics : Coming out to the light of day We got many moons than a deeper place So I keep an eye on the shadow's smile To see what it has to say You and I both know Everything must go away Ah, what do you say? Spinning off, head is on my heart It's like a bit of light and a touch of dark You got sneak attacked from the zodiac But I see your eyes spark Keep the breeze and go Blow...

Rage Against the Video Game Machine?

NOTE: If you haven't read the ' Foregrounding ' blog post or the one entitled ' Rough Draft ', please do that first. They're both short, but they matter a lot for what you're about to read. Okay. Done. Enjoy. Zach de la Rocha: "On truth devoured/Silent play in the shadow of power/A spectacle monopolized/The cameras eyes on choice disguised." Rage Against the Machine's single "Guerilla Radio" from their Battle of Los Angeles album is a reaction against the political circus and faux-choice presentations during the 2000 elections. The quote is not in full context (it is much more political than theoretical) here, but it provides a powerful starting block. A little bit of re-punctuation will help to clarify the thrust: "On truth devoured, silent play in the shadow of power [is] a spectacle [that] monopolized the cameras' eyes-on choice disguised." Line by line, we see parallels between how video games are perceived outside o...