Skip to main content

Rude

I got after some students for their behavior recently. Every teacher has a different way of approaching rowdy kids. Some shout. Some ignore it. Others talk to the kids separately. I tend to use a dose of sarcasm that's so heavy that it makes the legs of their chairs bend.

It generally takes a long while for me to get to the point that the chatter and conversations in the back of the room interfere too much and I unleash the Sardonic Beast. The result, I believe, is that the students--usually the ones most affected by my vocal vituperations--take offense at the "sudden" chastisement, as though they hadn't been making the class harder to manage for the last however long.

When this happens, there's a chilling effect in the room. I often have to use a sharper tone, more precise language, and blunter concepts. I once told students that didn't wear the uniform according to the way they knew they were supposed to that they were lying to me and I didn't appreciate their dishonesty. When I did that, the class took a few minutes to warm up to their previous level of engagement.

This creates a dilemma: The students' behavior is inappropriate and I need to correct it before I can allow the class to continue. If I do correct it, the class will be set back and it will take more effort to get us back on track and actually learning.

I'm not the first teacher to have this problem. In fact, I think most teachers see this dilemma, and, as I said, they all approach it in unique ways. What bothers me, however, is that it's the students who violate class decorum the most--the ones I lend the sharpest edge of my tongue--that feel the most victimized. When I give a student a verbal evisceration, they usually deserve some sort of censure (whether or not it's as much as I deliver, that is a different matter). But calling them out--particularly in the sarcastic mode I'm best at--usually means there are sentiments of "That was rude" are floating through the class.

The idea that the classmate, who has been so disruptive to the rest of the class, was also quite rude doesn't seem to enter into consideration.

Now, that isn't to say that I'm never without fault in an altercation like this. I've made some misjudgments, snapped at kids who didn't deserve it, or otherwise misdirected some vicious verbiage. Like all humans, I make mistakes. Indeed, I like to think that I'm better at being humble and making mistakes than most people. So I don't write this as an exculpatory essay, necessarily; it's more of something on my mind right now, so I thought I'd avail myself of the opportunity.

Rude, I know.

Popular posts from this blog

What Awaits

Where I live, there's just enough light pollution to keep most stars at bay. How interesting it is to consider that technology can push away the ancient photograph of celestial bodies that nightly parades, moving so predictably that we long assumed the stars more permanent than kings, more powerful than rulers. Were a civilization 65 million light years away to look through its telescope at our pale blue dot, they would see the light reflected off of dinosaur hides and feathers. Maybe that's why aliens haven't visited our planet: They're afraid of our teeth. The vastness of space is so mind-boggling big that it's sometimes easier to entrench than explore, to recoil instead of redouble our efforts to learn more. That emptiness--the same sky that almost everyone I know sleeps beneath--means something different to each person. How interesting it is to consider that the immensity of the galaxy in which we live, despite its ubiquity, can mean something so separate fr...

Dark Necessities

The second of my "music video essays", I'm exploring the single from Red Hot Chili Peppers' newest album, The Getaway , "Dark Necessities". As I did before, I'm posting the video and the lyrics here on the essay, and encourage you to watch and read along. In the case of the Peppers, it's always a good idea to have the lyrics handy, as the lead singer, Anthony Kiedis, has a tendency of mumbling and/or pronouncing words uniquely to create a particular effect--or he's super high, either possibility is there.  The Set Up Here's the video: And here are the lyrics : Coming out to the light of day We got many moons than a deeper place So I keep an eye on the shadow's smile To see what it has to say You and I both know Everything must go away Ah, what do you say? Spinning off, head is on my heart It's like a bit of light and a touch of dark You got sneak attacked from the zodiac But I see your eyes spark Keep the breeze and go Blow...

Rage Against the Video Game Machine?

NOTE: If you haven't read the ' Foregrounding ' blog post or the one entitled ' Rough Draft ', please do that first. They're both short, but they matter a lot for what you're about to read. Okay. Done. Enjoy. Zach de la Rocha: "On truth devoured/Silent play in the shadow of power/A spectacle monopolized/The cameras eyes on choice disguised." Rage Against the Machine's single "Guerilla Radio" from their Battle of Los Angeles album is a reaction against the political circus and faux-choice presentations during the 2000 elections. The quote is not in full context (it is much more political than theoretical) here, but it provides a powerful starting block. A little bit of re-punctuation will help to clarify the thrust: "On truth devoured, silent play in the shadow of power [is] a spectacle [that] monopolized the cameras' eyes-on choice disguised." Line by line, we see parallels between how video games are perceived outside o...