Skip to main content

Words' Worth

I created this blog in June 2008. The world was different: We didn't have a bunch of social media sites that are ubiquitous now; we'd yet to elect an African-American as president--or a reality TV star, for that matter. We didn't really have a grip on "reality TV", either. I had recently left a web design firm where I had worked as a content editor, purchased a new home, and then had my freelance work dry up--leaving me at home with a kid barely over a year old and only half a heart to boot. The other two children of my marriage weren't on the horizon yet, and though I was only a few weeks away from finally getting a teaching job, I didn't know that at the time.

So I wrote about a video game I like.

Since then, aside from getting established in my job, raising more children, navigating a post-surgery life with my oldest, and countless other achievements and experiences, I find myself daily posting on the same website, stretching myself to write more--to write better--and to find ways of leaking my prose into the less-filled moments of my life.

Built into this is a tension between my values of artistic expression qua artistry and the hard reality of the seemingly limitless power of capital to weed itself into every area of life. Every day, when I sit down to write another essay, I glance at how many views my posts have attracted. There's no correlation between how long it takes me to write one of these and how frequently it's seen. But I can certainly detect trends.

For example, my essay about Spider-Man didn't even crack 20 views. But my ramblings about haircuts surpassed 35. I worked harder on the Spider-Man reminiscence, but fewer people cared to read about it. I found hot-button issues garner more views (like the one on strong female characters). And that's what's led me to this dilemma: Whether or not to monetize the blog.

Now, I try not to be too meta about what I'm doing here. In the past, I've pointed out that this is my blog and I'll do what I want on it, or explain a particular essay thread (like my story journal for Writ in Blood), or maybe some other personal musing aloud about what the purpose of my "blogging"* is supposed to be. I deliberately try not to "clear my throat", as it were, at the beginning of a post, by writing how "I don't know what I'm going to say, but blah blah blah," instead trying to craft a worthwhile headline that I then tie into the end of my essay. In short, I don't want to think about the process of how I write my essay as much as I want to get the essay out there. That being said, I can't explore my issues with monetization without breaking whatever filament of artistry** that I've tried to cultivate over the last half year or so--hence this paragraph, which is a paralipsis and don't think I didn't do that on purpose.

But when it comes to Blogspot, which hosts this site, it is equipped with an AdSense option. That is, I can "sell" screen space to Google advertisers, who in turn will pay me a tiny bit for every click I get. This isn't likely to be much money--likely not enough to even be worth the effort of cashing the digital check. Sure, I've written a couple of things that have hit triple digits, but they're the exception rather than the rule. And I worry, less that I'm "selling out" (as that would imply my creative output were dictated by the ones cutting the check) and more that I would be in the realm of "targeted content", choosing to write what would get people interested rather than what I feel like discussing.

Dumping on Trump, for example, got me a lot of views. Discussing Shakespeare? Not so much. Would I feel the impulse to turn this into a perpetual political machine or follow my passion? I'd like to think that I would still just be me and do my own "me thing", but in the back of my mind I would be thinking, "Hey, even though I don't have a feminist point to discuss today, I should write about that anyway. All for the clicks, yo."

On the other other hand, it's nice to say that I write for writing's sake, but maybe I only say that because that's all I have. Is having a lump sum from a publisher as an advance on a book still "selling out"? Would I feel moral ambiguity because I was writing in the hopes that someone would pay me money because they want to (perish the thought) read what I wrote? Then again, a publisher is paid by the people who are actively seeking the content, which money is then redirected to the author. Here, you are the product. The advertisers would be paying me to get to you, and that seems more and more distasteful the longer I think on it.

Then again, the 21st century is essentially one of billboards. How effective online ads are is anyone's guess, but the digital equivalent of billboards--large, tacky, and relatively benign--is a good one. Would it make a difference if there was an AdSense taking up some of the screen space on my essays?

In a way, I guess I'm asking, what are my words worth?

And God knows that I have no sense of that answer.


---
* I still find the term "blog" and "blogging" and all derivations of the word insipid. That hasn't changed since my first post. Even "post" is distasteful for me; I tend to refer to what I do here as "essays" because that sounds snootier.
** I think this is also part of the impulse to turn off comments. I don't know how I feel about my essays being areas of discussion with me as a part of the conversation. There are some, of course, who like the idea of putting something out there, getting involved in the comments, and letting things go from there. For some reason, I'm reluctant to do that here. I've drifted into Facebook comments here or there, but usually it goes so far as "liking" someone's comment, then moving on. I haven't decided how much of my life I want to live in these online discussions, so I've removed the ability of others to comment here. If someone wishes to write in detailed response, I'd hope she'd write her own essay on her blog/website. So, for whatever that's worth.

Popular posts from this blog

Teaching in Utah

The Utah State Board of Education, in tandem with the state legislature, have a new answer to the shortage of Utah teachers: a bachelor's degree and a test are sufficient qualifications for being a teacher. I have some thoughts about this recent decision, but it requires some context. Additionally, this is a very  long read, so I don't blame you if you don't finish it. Well....maybe a little. But not enough to hurt our friendship. Probably. ARLs and Endorsements Teaching is a tricky career, and not all teachers start out wanting to be in the classroom. Fortunately, there are alternatives for people to become licensed teachers who come from this camp. We have a handful of possibilities, but the two I want to focus on are ARLs (Alternative Routes to Licensure) and endorsements. Both already require the bachelor's degree as the minimum requirement, and since that doesn't change in the new law, we'll set that aside as a commonality. As additional context, h...

Dark Necessities

The second of my "music video essays", I'm exploring the single from Red Hot Chili Peppers' newest album, The Getaway , "Dark Necessities". As I did before, I'm posting the video and the lyrics here on the essay, and encourage you to watch and read along. In the case of the Peppers, it's always a good idea to have the lyrics handy, as the lead singer, Anthony Kiedis, has a tendency of mumbling and/or pronouncing words uniquely to create a particular effect--or he's super high, either possibility is there.  The Set Up Here's the video: And here are the lyrics : Coming out to the light of day We got many moons than a deeper place So I keep an eye on the shadow's smile To see what it has to say You and I both know Everything must go away Ah, what do you say? Spinning off, head is on my heart It's like a bit of light and a touch of dark You got sneak attacked from the zodiac But I see your eyes spark Keep the breeze and go Blow...

Rage Against the Video Game Machine?

NOTE: If you haven't read the ' Foregrounding ' blog post or the one entitled ' Rough Draft ', please do that first. They're both short, but they matter a lot for what you're about to read. Okay. Done. Enjoy. Zach de la Rocha: "On truth devoured/Silent play in the shadow of power/A spectacle monopolized/The cameras eyes on choice disguised." Rage Against the Machine's single "Guerilla Radio" from their Battle of Los Angeles album is a reaction against the political circus and faux-choice presentations during the 2000 elections. The quote is not in full context (it is much more political than theoretical) here, but it provides a powerful starting block. A little bit of re-punctuation will help to clarify the thrust: "On truth devoured, silent play in the shadow of power [is] a spectacle [that] monopolized the cameras' eyes-on choice disguised." Line by line, we see parallels between how video games are perceived outside o...