Skip to main content

Lent

I amn't Catholic. In fact, aside from the basics of the religion--which are rather similar to the beliefs of most Christianity--I don't understand a lot about Catholicism. That isn't to say I haven't studied it or tried to map it onto my understanding of the world, of course. Especially when it comes to historical Catholicism, I only have a sense of the most significant doctrines as they pertained to history (no divorce allowed led to the formation of the Anglican Church, for example). But I mix up holy days and I can't remember any patron saints (except for Saint George, because he's the patron saint of England, though I've no idea what he did).

To repeat: I'm not Catholic.

Neither am I Protestant in any significant way. It's beyond the scope of this essay to consider what Mormonism is (I think the idea of it being a fourth Abrahamic tradition is perhaps the closest analysis), so I'm approaching the tradition of celebrating Lent cautiously and as a curious outsider.

Now, as a self-identified Christian*, I think there's a lot about Lent that I can work toward. But because of my general ignorance, I'm cherry-picking the stuff that I know I can implement and understand. For example, I'm giving up Facebook for Lent. This isn't a major, life-shaking sacrifice, but I find that my time on Facebook is, generally, ill-spent. However, I'm not wiping ashes on my forehead, and though I plan on fasting during Lent--twice, as a matter of fact--and donating money as a result of the fast, that's comfortably within the purview of my Mormonism.

So why bother? Well, one of the reasons (as I understand it) that Catholics and other Lent-observing faiths put forth the lenten effort is because the impulse to indulge in what's being foregone helps to remind the disciple of Jesus Christ. This is something that I've been taught to do in my own worship: Fasting pains should remind the faster of what she is fasting. That is, the physical discomfort is turned toward what one hopes to gain. If my impulse to check Facebook is redirected toward Jesus, I think I'll become a better person.

But this is a conditional thing. First of all, I don't really like being on Facebook. I'm on there because it keeps me connected, but I don't normally care much about the vast majority of posts. When I go on there, I get stuck for a long time, mostly just because. I'm on Facebook, so I stick around. Letting go of that time-sink isn't a particularly large sacrifice.

I'm doing this anyway, though, and my thought behind it is pretty straightforward: I need to let go of something tangible and I feel solidarity with other disciples when I approach it this way.

"Wait," I can almost hear you saying, "I saw this essay on Facebook! Hypocrite much?"

First of all, that last question doesn't even make grammatical sense. And additionally, I'm still providing a link to my daily essays. I've taken the app off my phone, and I will essentially post the essay, then close the window. I'm not trying to carve out exceptions: I have a couple dozen regular readers, and they're coming in almost exclusively from Facebook. If I wanted to write something that no one could possibly read, I wouldn't post on a blog.

So, yes, I'm "on Facebook", but I won't be lingering. Post and move on, that's the plan.

Here's hoping that Lent will lend me some of the spirituality that I feel I'm lacking.


---
* I'm leery about qualifying myself unequivocally as a Christian, all baggage of the word (and the baggage of my Mormonism) taken into account. That's also something beyond the scope of this essay.

Popular posts from this blog

Rage Against the Video Game Machine?

NOTE: If you haven't read the ' Foregrounding ' blog post or the one entitled ' Rough Draft ', please do that first. They're both short, but they matter a lot for what you're about to read. Okay. Done. Enjoy. Zach de la Rocha: "On truth devoured/Silent play in the shadow of power/A spectacle monopolized/The cameras eyes on choice disguised." Rage Against the Machine's single "Guerilla Radio" from their Battle of Los Angeles album is a reaction against the political circus and faux-choice presentations during the 2000 elections. The quote is not in full context (it is much more political than theoretical) here, but it provides a powerful starting block. A little bit of re-punctuation will help to clarify the thrust: "On truth devoured, silent play in the shadow of power [is] a spectacle [that] monopolized the cameras' eyes-on choice disguised." Line by line, we see parallels between how video games are perceived outside o...

Dark Necessities

The second of my "music video essays", I'm exploring the single from Red Hot Chili Peppers' newest album, The Getaway , "Dark Necessities". As I did before, I'm posting the video and the lyrics here on the essay, and encourage you to watch and read along. In the case of the Peppers, it's always a good idea to have the lyrics handy, as the lead singer, Anthony Kiedis, has a tendency of mumbling and/or pronouncing words uniquely to create a particular effect--or he's super high, either possibility is there.  The Set Up Here's the video: And here are the lyrics : Coming out to the light of day We got many moons than a deeper place So I keep an eye on the shadow's smile To see what it has to say You and I both know Everything must go away Ah, what do you say? Spinning off, head is on my heart It's like a bit of light and a touch of dark You got sneak attacked from the zodiac But I see your eyes spark Keep the breeze and go Blow...

On Violence

NOTE: This is a long one. It's also a lot more theoretical than conversational. If you have a question, please feel free to post so that I can try to be more clear. There is little debate on what the greatest debate is when it comes to video games: Does the imaginary violence of the game translate into violent behavior in the real world? It seems to be very much a 'depends on your point of view' type of argument. Not only does it depend on one's point of view, but also the particular study itself, what it focuses on, and how well it's managed. It is also important to note the rhetorical tricks of the debate*, since most of the data are coming from second or third sources. But I am no statistician, so numbers do nothing to help me to understand the issue. In fact, numbers about this argument are superfluous, since the entire point of gaming (whether the gamer/designer/critic is aware of it or not) is the individual as the ideal. Let's look at violence, then, shal...